Dwelling is thought to be one of the most resilient forms of architecture. But upon close inspection of history, it becomes evident that perhaps it is a form that went through most vibrant changes. But this notion of conservativism rise from the fact that in a given time and social conditions, adjusting the typology of ‘a house’ is usually viewed as a brutal act of an architect for novelty. Hence lies the problem: how one should proceed to incorporate the on-going changes of ‘living’ with the given norms. From our search to ‘break’ the rooms from their independent states (in our previous projects a house and g house), now we have begun to apply non-sensical and playfulness as an antidote to seriousness. The very ‘casing’ of a family has become a non-sensical proposition since the core concept of family is in process of redefinition. Perhaps this can only be exercised to a single residential type, with the clients known and willing. This is a quest we would like to follow through our following projects.